Libertarianism video compilations | Bladder-Control Videos

Bladder-Control Videos

Bladder-Control Related Videos

Incontinence - Overactive-bladder - Urinary-incontinence

Bladder-Control Sponsors

You like it? Share it!

Ebook on Stopping Hair Loss And Regrowing Hair Naturally

check it out ...
Posted by: mr1001nights

Video duration: 321 seconds
Global video hits: 62177

check it out

Related: capitalism, libertarianism, anarchism

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Wow allot of ...
By: 2DRonaldo. on 08 Sep 10, 16:00:41
Wow allot of Right-Wing Liber-Fascists downvoting this video.

@MrBlakskwrl ...
By: MrBlakskwrl. on 08 Sep 10, 02:17:22
@MrBlakskwrl notreasonDOTcom/2009/06/08/murray-rothbard-on-chomsky-left-anarchists/ Entire article

@MrBlakskwrl ; the ...
By: MrBlakskwrl. on 08 Sep 10, 02:15:35
@MrBlakskwrl ; the problem is that, in so expressing his horror at the possible results of complete freedom, Professor Chomsky reveals that he is not really an ?anarchist? at all, indeed that he prefers statism to an anarcho-capitalist world. That of course is his prerogative, and scarcely unusual, but what is illegitimate is for this distinguished linguist to call himself an ?anarchist?. - Rothbard

@MrBlakskwrl ...
By: MrBlakskwrl. on 08 Sep 10, 02:14:41
@MrBlakskwrl Secondly, Chomsky has written that the anarcho-capitalist society would constitute ?the greatest tyranny the world has ever known?. (What, Noam? Greater than Hitler? than Ghengis Khan?) Whether or not anarcho-capitalism would be tyrannical is here irrelevant;

Take for example ...
By: MrBlakskwrl. on 08 Sep 10, 02:13:51
Take for example one of our most distinguished socialist-anarchists, Professor Noam Chomsky. Professor Chomsky has recently expressed a great deal of worry about the recent rise of our ?right-wing? libertarian movement; apparently he is ? I am afraid unrealistically ? concerned that we might succeed in abolishing the State before the State has succeeded in abolishing private property!

The problem with ...
By: bolognamof. on 08 Sep 10, 01:05:34
The problem with Chomsky is I believe that he is devoid of basic principle. If he believes in liberty then he should not just pick which parts he likes. Wage slavery is a ridiculous notion and Chomsky only uses it to evoke anger and emotion. Freedom of contract anyone? Chomsky has absolutely no understanding of economics and this is why he should never talk about the market! He should stay good at what he is doing which is his foreign policy insights and viewpoints, but that's about it!

Give him any ...
By: FedorEight. on 07 Sep 10, 21:17:41
Give him any political/social/economic concept that doesn't go hand-in-hand with Marxist dogma - and he tries desperately to refute it: using fallacies, half-truths, outright lies, spin-doctoring en masse, all wrapped up in his finely articulated semantic horseshit which serves to impress those who place low value on their own intellect. It's his JOB to refute anything non-Marxist. Once you understand this simple and obvious fact, you understand this charlatan 90% better...

@phrimburger That ...
By: franks2732. on 02 Sep 10, 07:42:56
@phrimburger That is because you are not a Libertarian. You are an "American Right Libertarian" which is a "Anarcho Capitalist"The political leaders of that group usurped the world simply as a means to sucker people. Because "Anarcho Capitalist" just will not win many fans. Sadly people blindly follow their mantra without one independent thought. What Americans call libertarians is not libertarians but when I debate you guys I call you that as it is how you wished to be addressed

@pulsatingremedy ...
By: franks2732. on 02 Sep 10, 07:37:05
@pulsatingremedy The sad fact is that "Right Libertarians i.e. American Libertarians have twisted wherever possible the meaning of words to suit their narrow construct. They simply ignore everything. When debating the idiots. You have to have two dictionaries. The one every sane person regardless of belief uses, then Theirs.

@phrimburger To ...
By: pulsatingremedy. on 31 Aug 10, 21:23:00
@phrimburger To give you an example of a libertarian group. The French Libertarian Youth were the first documented to use the circle A, the circle represents an 'O'. The A O refer to the Proudhon quote: "liberty (Anarchy) is the mother of Order."

@phrimburger Well ...
By: pulsatingremedy. on 31 Aug 10, 21:16:32
@phrimburger Well I think he described the word libertarian perfectly. Someone who tries to reduce the authority on the individual. But you are probably an American fake libertarian. (sorry in advance if I'm wrong) What Chomsky is referring to, is the real world libertarian. Socialists who disagree with the authoritarian forms of socialism. Or with better words: anti-Lenin socialists. Libertarianism includes ideologies such as mutualism (free market socialism) and left communism.

@pulsatingremedy I ...
By: phrimburger. on 31 Aug 10, 21:05:04
@pulsatingremedy I am a libertarian and I don't feel he described me.

@phrimburger I ...
By: pulsatingremedy. on 31 Aug 10, 12:12:40
@phrimburger I doubt it.

@ ...
By: pulsatingremedy. on 31 Aug 10, 11:06:24
@SUpersaiyajinjerkbag It's comparable with the Israel-Palestine issue. An anarchist would say, a no-state solution is best. However, we both know that that is not achievable and that it would fail miserably. So when faced with a difficult issue, we should take easy steps towards the best solution. It is useless to advocate things that are unachievable. So when asked what we should with the corporations. Pure socialism is unachievable at this time. So for now, regulate them!

@pulsatingremedy ...
By: SUpersaiyajinjerkbag. on 31 Aug 10, 01:38:24
@pulsatingremedy Not really. Chomsky is basically advocating the regulation of corporations. Reasonable but not really "anarchist".

@sh4p3shifter Too ...
By: pulsatingremedy. on 30 Aug 10, 22:37:03
@sh4p3shifter Too much information for you? Go back to your fox news, tool.

@ ...
By: pulsatingremedy. on 30 Aug 10, 22:36:40
@SUpersaiyajinjerkbag Liberalism is a capitalist ideology. Libertarian socialism refers to systems like anarchism.

Meh, I see ...
By: SUpersaiyajinjerkbag. on 30 Aug 10, 19:28:22
Meh, I see chomsky's point of view, but come on, "libertarian socialist" is just a fancy, impractical word for liberal, really (minus the feminism lol)

chomsky is a cunt ...
By: sh4p3shifter. on 30 Aug 10, 16:17:46
chomsky is a cunt imo.

...Also, (according ...
By: shadowgeyser. on 30 Aug 10, 02:04:59
...Also, (according to wikipedia, lol) anarcho-Socialists & ilk (rightfully) rail against Corporatism, but Corporatism only exists because of the State and Government intervention, and anarcho-Capitalists dislike Corporatism as well. "[t]o demonise state authoritarianism while ignoring identical albeit contract-consecrated subservient arrangements in the large-scale corporations which control the world economy is fetishism at its worst."[72]

There's some things ...
By: shadowgeyser. on 30 Aug 10, 02:02:59
There's some things here I'm not clear on...1) in anarcho-Socialism/Collectivism/Communism, do people voluntarily or *in*voluntarily pay for services thru taxation (i.e. Hayek on "Collectivism is slavery", 2) he mentions businesses as being "unaccountable" if they make a mistake, but basic economics seems to say otherwise; that businesses have to consider people for their profit. Anyone want to clear this up? Not trying to start shit, just understand.

Really, you say: ...
By: suddenlyitsobvious. on 29 Aug 10, 20:54:17
Really, you say: "as an engineer & lawyer truth is exact in the former & approximate to the latter." Does this mean that when you work on a legal case facts are only approximately true? That formulations only approximately convey what is meant? I'd say law is pretty PRECISE and legal formulations are all about precision. Would you say in a criminal case a defendent was "approximately" guilty? It is simply a fact of life, that when opinions A and B differ, typically one or both are wrong.

I'm sorry but ...
By: suddenlyitsobvious. on 29 Aug 10, 20:46:37
I'm sorry but hardly any of your phrases doesn't contain an inaccuracy. I didn't claim to have the truth, as you say. You say: "to me as an engineer & lawyer truth is exact in the former & approximate to the latter." Doesn't mean anything except to convey your credentials, credentials a returning theme in your prose. Truth is an abstraction? I don't know what to do with all this. Let's keep it clear an simple: you say our views are equally valid. My question: WHY are they equally valid?

@suddenlyitsobvious ...
By: jereuter01. on 29 Aug 10, 20:27:44
@suddenlyitsobvious I would never claim to understand everything I have read by Chomsky or anyone else for that matter. There are more than two possible views that are contridictory and can occur on different levels. Some claim as you to "have" the truth, but to me as an engineer & lawyer truth is exact in the former & approximate to the latter. It is the search for meaning that leads to a truth, and once you arrive another search awaits. Truth, Beauty, Justice, Love all are abstractions.

@jereuter01 If ...
By: suddenlyitsobvious. on 29 Aug 10, 18:37:43
@jereuter01 If two contradictory views are equally valid in your eyes it means truth has no meaning to you. You are allowed to have your opinion, obviously. You can read 16 Chomsky books but that doesn't indicate that you understood them. Indeed, let's move on.

Are you a libertarian?
Posted by: shanedk

Video duration: 289 seconds
Global video hits: 22821

The World's Smallest Political Quiz: www.theadvocates.org Randomized version of the quiz: www.shanekillian.org CNN reporter exposed: www.youtube.com

Related: libertarian, quiz, nolan, chart, tea, party, parties

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Are Libertarians ...
By: korwinblue. on 07 Sep 10, 09:23:51
Are Libertarians Liberals or Realists? Its kinda confusing, because I see aspects of Libertarianism in both theories.

Lol I got 100% ...
By: EclecticSceptic. on 07 Sep 10, 06:20:57
Lol I got 100% liberal in the short version. I got liberal/centrist in the full version. I'd be a libertarian-socialist anarchisty kind of person.

70,70; not ...
By: worldruler086. on 05 Sep 10, 15:06:01
70,70; not surprised, and I hate Glenn Beck, the "greatest libertarian that ever walked God's kingdom" *sigh*

At the top, and ...
By: sportsxguy22. on 05 Sep 10, 05:30:44
At the top, and proud.

No, no surprises.
By: TheRacistsMustDie. on 02 Sep 10, 13:30:20
No, no surprises.

The tea partiers ...
By: SirPwn4lot. on 02 Sep 10, 09:54:27
The tea partiers are libertarians? Sure, I'm sure some are, but the VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST VAST majority of them I've seen (IRL) are just sheep who think Obama's a Muslim and that all progressives (whatever that term even means) are communist infiltrators It's time people started to admit that Libertarianism doesn't naturally include a free license for the private sector

Organized by ...
By: Vitaminous. on 31 Aug 10, 22:15:57
Organized by libertarians, hijacked by conservatives. Republicans ruining everything, as usual.

libertarian is ...
By: sh4p3shifter. on 30 Aug 10, 16:16:20
libertarian is economically conservative and socially liberal so fuck the left right paradigm.

@PerditaLupo, ...
By: rebelq1. on 28 Aug 10, 11:52:44
@PerditaLupo, You're confusing libertarians with right-wingers!

@PerditaLupo "Bob ...
By: shanedk. on 27 Aug 10, 22:35:47
@PerditaLupo "Bob Barr ... republican ran for? President as a Libertarian" After neocons overran the convention, and even then it took SIX TRIES for them to select him over Mary Ruwart. Do your fucking research. "Ron Paul says he's a libertarian but runs as a Republican" Ron Paul was the 1988 Libertarian candidate for President. Do your fucking research. And if you don't think Libertarians are talking bad about Beck or Barr etc., you need to DO YOUR FUCKING RESEARCH!!!

Bob Barr ... ...
By: PerditaLupo. on 27 Aug 10, 21:20:12
Bob Barr ... republican ran for President as a Libertarian, Ron Paul says he's a libertarian but runs as a Republican. Glenn Beck frequently mentions that he is either a libertarian or leans libertarian, and Glenn beck frequently has libertarian guests. Glenn Beck is on Fox News, Fox News gives millions to the Republican Party. Republicans are COURTING libertarians all the time, and I rarely see libertarians ... especially the LP talk as bad about Republican Presidents and etc. is all I'm sayin

@PerditaLupo "When ...
By: shanedk. on 27 Aug 10, 18:00:39
@PerditaLupo "When libertarians support Glenn Beck" We don't. "and BELIEVE that Beck is a Libertarian?" we don't.

No, I'm not a ...
By: PerditaLupo. on 27 Aug 10, 17:33:24
No, I'm not a libertarian, and I'll tell you why ... When libertarians support Glenn Beck and BELIEVE that Beck is a Libertarian .... then they ARE Right wingers. Libertarians USE to be Libertarian .... they've run former republican candidates and have love fests with righties all the time .... if it walks like a duck .... quacks like a duck ....

Just got round to ...
By: pi3p142. on 27 Aug 10, 07:42:09
Just got round to the political quiz. 70% personal 50% economic, a centrist but pretty close to Liberal and Libertarian.

I'm kinda confused ...
By: midgety1. on 26 Aug 10, 09:53:40
I'm kinda confused here. I thought a liberals and democrats are not necessarily the same thing and likewise a republicans and a conservatives are not the same thing? is that incorrect? and I don't know much about libertarians so whats the difference between anarchy and libertarianism in its extreme (no government of economics and no government for social or moral issues) you seemed offended by the comparison but to me they sound fairly similar (meant respectably im not trying to be a A-hole)

Libertarian with a ...
By: HHSFHarry. on 24 Aug 10, 02:25:57
Libertarian with a slight conservative tinge...Only because I favor strong national defense (but not frequent foreign engagements, I do NOT support our current conflicts), and because I'm pro-life. Other than that, pretty much straight libertarian.

@shanedk then ...
By: smithwicktom. on 22 Aug 10, 11:27:11
@shanedk then lines should read: eliminate ss; change current tax system to voluntary...or i could be leaning to anarchy. your insight is appreciated.

@shanedk then ...
By: smithwicktom. on 22 Aug 10, 11:21:28
@shanedk then lines should read: eliminate ss; change current tax system to voluntary...or i could be leaning to anarchy. your insight is appreciated.

@shanedk then ...
By: smithwicktom. on 22 Aug 10, 11:20:41
@shanedk then lines should read: eliminate ss; change current tax system to voluntary...or i could be leaning to anarchy. your insight is appreciated.

@shanedk then ...
By: smithwicktom. on 22 Aug 10, 11:15:55
@shanedk then lines should read: eliminate ss; change current tax system to voluntary.

@shanedk then ...
By: smithwicktom. on 22 Aug 10, 11:14:57
@shanedk then lines should read: eliminate ss; change current tax system to voluntary

@shanedk then ...
By: smithwicktom. on 22 Aug 10, 11:14:35
@shanedk then lines should read: eliminate ss; change current tax system to voluntary.

@shanedk then ...
By: smithwicktom. on 22 Aug 10, 11:14:02
@shanedk then lines should read: eliminate ss; change current tax system to voluntary.

@shanedk then lines ...
By: smithwicktom. on 22 Aug 10, 11:12:46
@shanedk then lines should read: eliminate ss; change current tax system to voluntary.

@smithwicktom No, ...
By: shanedk. on 22 Aug 10, 11:05:20
@smithwicktom No, privatizing SS means removing the SS tax (and everyone contributes voluntarily to the fund if they want to). And cutting taxes to 0 counts as cutting them 50% or more.

Mark Sanford Fires Back At Lindsey Graham In Defense Of Libertarians
Posted by: c4lsc

Video duration: 70 seconds
Global video hits: 29958

Amanda Moore asks Governor Mark Sanford about Libertarians.

Related: mark, sanford, lindsey, graham, libertarians, ron, paul

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Not as bad a dude ...
By: typebhero. on 23 Aug 10, 10:35:42
Not as bad a dude as the media would lead you to believe.

I'd bet the CIA dug ...
By: cacapoopoo27. on 23 Mar 10, 08:39:28
I'd bet the CIA dug up his skeletons and outed him the second they realized he may be a viable liberty candidate for president in 2012. They knew he would challenge the status quo. He understands markets thrive with less government interference and even spoke out against preemptive war.

FREEDOM !!!!
By: GeneralBerger. on 13 Jan 10, 02:51:11
FREEDOM !!!!

BadAssGiver: Well, ...
By: eaodak. on 06 Jan 10, 18:20:45
BadAssGiver: Well, since you quite obviously did not finish high school, I think it puts the nail in the coffin about your military claims.... Listen retard, go peddle crazy somewhere else, we're not buying any here. You are absolutely free to express as much of your mental illness as possible. But you should take care in whom you threaten online, one never knows who they are posting to.

2 retorts on 1 cmt? ...
By: badassgixer. on 06 Jan 10, 15:29:31
2 retorts on 1 cmt?!?! And now U R a J.D. too huh? No threats, just an opportunity for you if u wish 2 accept, but you didn't did u? I love opinions expressed by ppl that have no real life experience at anything. As far as the master thing, again a window n2 who u r. A little big boy talk and ur on to the profanity and insults. ur sensitive huh? your flaw to hubris reactions and puerile thinking is funny, really! Glad 2 c u mind ur parents so well as not 2 respnd, oh but u did & twice no less.

BumAssLicker: And ...
By: eaodak. on 30 Dec 09, 06:29:49
BumAssLicker: And I quote, "with evry line u write you show how ignorant u r. I didnt carry a weapon." Wow, you really are a fucking idiot. I did not bother responding to you, you dolt, because my parents taught me not to torment dumb animals... But obviously I am Your Master, and now you are My Dog. Back to your Hole My Dog!

What are you ...
By: eaodak. on 30 Dec 09, 02:39:13
What are you babbling about? I should warn you that if you are threatening me online, you are not only committing a crime in your state, but a federal crime. If you long to go to an ass pounding prison that's your own business. But I certainly am not going to entertain some mental infant with his GI Joe fantasies. Lotsa luck in the nut house!

Wonder all you like.
By: badassgixer. on 29 Dec 09, 08:05:41
Wonder all you like.

I guess the 28 yr ...
By: badassgixer. on 29 Dec 09, 08:00:37
I guess the 28 yr old coment hit a nerve huh? with evry line u write you show how ignorant u r. I didnt carry a weapon. I was in aviation and still am. I can assure you This GI is no dumb dumb. But I cant expect someone with your background to understand anything other than a critique mentality. U cant live life in a commentary position as u do. sometimes you got to get your hands dirty, then whos gong 2 do it ? YOU? talkng only get u so far. I'll b n Arnhem in Jan. i can show u what i mean...

BAG: (good moniker ...
By: eaodak. on 20 Dec 09, 18:07:26
BAG: (good moniker you chose for yourself....) You have done nothing but get brainwashed into thinking that you are a 'Hero' (you're not) and that you are 'defending America' (which you are not, but actually weakening it). The military is a giant welfare state so that dumb dumb's such as yourself are not out in the streets causing trouble. Better to put a rifle in your hands and to murder innocent women and children and burn homes down(or so goes the logic of your masters)....

Your Welcome would ...
By: badassgixer. on 20 Dec 09, 17:53:22
Your Welcome would had been enough. The very fact you have the ability to speak out is a freedom you have but not quite payed for. your prolly a 28 yr old living with ur parents. I have a suggestion, try doing something you dont want to for some one you have never met. and yes I was serving "you" . the thing ppl like u dont get is that because ppl like us will stand a post makes it possible for u 2 b u. and yes it does insult me to be so so about my values form someone whom has none.

Ronald Reagan wa a ...
By: eaodak. on 16 Dec 09, 07:25:56
Ronald Reagan wa a terroist, drug dealer and war criminal who should have been dragged into the street and shot like the dog he was. I'm sad his face won't be on Rushmore, it's too much of a pain to piss on his grave in Cali!

Sandford is a scum ...
By: eaodak. on 16 Dec 09, 07:24:12
Sandford is a scum bag of the first order. You need your head examined....

Really? Is that how ...
By: eaodak. on 16 Dec 09, 07:23:08
Really? Is that how it works? The military should be abolished, as the Constituion mandates. The only standing military forces the are C mandated are navies and a small militia for home defense. Once we went by way of Empire the Honor, Service, Duty crap became just that. This Cult of Hero that has grown around the military, police, etc leads DIRECTLY to corruption, on all levels. Soldiers are NOT heroes, they are just people.

I'm sorry, you ...
By: eaodak. on 16 Dec 09, 07:19:53
I'm sorry, you sound like a nice guy and I don't want to insult you, but by 'serving' in Hondorus, you're not suggesting that YOU were protecting or 'serving' me? You were serving your corporate masters. Simply 'following orders' is not enough, the NAzi's tried that defense. The US military is thouroughly corrupt and dishonest. The US military MAKES us MORE unsafe, not less. I suggest you read Gen Smedley Darlington Butler's "War is a Racket".

you know, the more ...
By: Inferno41. on 14 Dec 09, 21:40:47
you know, the more you throw around those buzzwords from the recruitment posters, the more i wonder if YOU ever served.

I can tell you ...
By: badassgixer. on 14 Dec 09, 16:37:05
I can tell you never served, and thats ok. The reason u start something is rarely the singular reason you stay. You do it 1st for the oath you took( Defending the Constitution.), then for men you serve with & ur family. In military language it's called HONOR, DUTY, COUNTRY, and SERVICE. It's not for the servicemen to choose the mission just HONOR the ones before you by doing ur DUTY to ur COUNTRY with ur SERVICE. Then by doing this u r protecting the constitution and the freedom it guarantees.

Thank you for your ...
By: Inferno41. on 12 Dec 09, 19:47:51
Thank you for your service. I don't want to distract any more from the posted video and its topic, but...you and I both know there are a lot of people in the military who aren't in it for the constitution and American principles of liberty. Both grunts on the ground and brass at the top.

Late reply I know. ...
By: badassgixer. on 11 Dec 09, 16:04:49
Late reply I know. But NO I was not apart of the Federal Gov't. I was supporting and defending the Constitution as was the oath I took the day I began serving. I served in Honduras, well as other places, and I saw first hand the lack of moral and justifiable action by our leaders. WE served and followed our orders and now as a civi, I can speak my mind and have absolutely earned the right to say whatever i Damn well want to. Your welcome from all of us whom have defended your right 2 also.

Its ashame that he ...
By: monegarand. on 11 Dec 09, 03:12:14
Its ashame that he got caught in this affair. I would have voted for him for president. Still would.

Bill Clinton did ...
By: 2012Liberty1. on 30 Nov 09, 19:39:52
Bill Clinton did the same shit, i now like this dude, cheating on your wife is family treason, but cheating the constitution is high treason! Or what do you think, I don't know much!

I do think its ...
By: dbmcmillan. on 09 Nov 09, 08:45:34
I do think its highly immoral that he cheated on his wife but I also think he's good in his heart and deserves to be judged on his views and accomplishments and not his personal mistakes.

Who cares about his ...
By: calimar28. on 17 Oct 09, 15:55:09
Who cares about his wife misstress personal life stuff? The man is a good executive. Re-elect him. I swear, if the religious right keeps holding people to account for cheating, then there wont be anymore republicans...everybody cheats almost.

If you analyze it I ...
By: JMB312. on 15 Oct 09, 01:50:37
If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals -- if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom. - Ronald Reagan

I'm so sad that his ...
By: redgalaxy4. on 26 Sep 09, 01:17:07
I'm so sad that his chances for 2012 are shot because of his situation. I really hope people can forgive him by then and he can still be a viable candidate. Is it possible?

True News 31: Naughty Libertarianism!
Posted by: stefbot

Video duration: 1508 seconds
Global video hits: 6963

Rebutting an an article with a typical hate-on for Libertarianism. www.freedomainradio. com http

Related: libertarian, media, debating, article, freedomain, constitution

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

@leldoryn For the ...
By: Surhotchaperchlorome. on 14 Aug 10, 06:12:57
@leldoryn For the parasitical class, maybe. :P

@ ...
By: leldoryn. on 14 Aug 10, 06:04:23
@Surhotchaperchlorome Well tyranny IS the most EFFICIENT form of government :P

I think you meant ...
By: lashkaretoiba. on 07 Aug 10, 05:33:11
I think you meant to say consumers.

@lordthawkeye Yup! ...
By: Surhotchaperchlorome. on 16 Jul 10, 23:58:14
@lordthawkeye Yup! And we all know how well tyranny has worked, RIIIIGHT!? ;P

The really funny ...
By: lordthawkeye. on 03 Jul 10, 23:44:34
The really funny thing about the red vs. blue argument, even if all of that were true, that would be an argument for tyranny, not democracy.

On a completely ...
By: Surhotchaperchlorome. on 03 Jul 10, 20:55:26
On a completely unrelated note, the thumbnail image makes it look like you are singing an opera. :P

@leavesofliberty i ...
By: lettherebedots. on 24 Jun 10, 13:48:48
@leavesofliberty i think it was total cheese tbh

One of my favorite ...
By: Helionaeic. on 23 Jun 10, 20:03:11
One of my favorite videos of yours. You cured me of my minarchism. I now tell my friends that I am an Abolishionist. =)

@lettherebedots ...
By: leavesofliberty. on 23 Jun 10, 05:25:22
@lettherebedots funny

YES! Dude, you just ...
By: cucumbersalad2. on 24 May 10, 23:18:21
YES! Dude, you just...GET IT. THANK YOU THANK YOU I'm posting this everywhere. You're making it so simple! Again T H A N K Y O U

You need to take ...
By: Thanatos6619. on 23 May 10, 23:40:22
You need to take away the liberty of one man to become a dictator to protect the liberty of those they would enslave PURE FREEDOM would include the freedom to shoot anyone you felt like the vary desire to remove the government is the same thing.

We need to preserve ...
By: lettherebedots. on 05 May 10, 14:52:11
We need to preserve your genius Stefan! So we need to take your brain out to protect it!

Easily your best ...
By: Bemno2. on 15 Apr 10, 18:33:39
Easily your best video so far (35 of 97). THIS is the one that I will recommend to my statist friends and the numerous people that I debate these issues with. It's snappy, funny, direct, concise and points out the many deadly statist paradoxes quite delightfully. MUCH better than your "Intervention" video which was too talky, kinda nebulous and lacking in punch. Love your material, gonna watch them all A fellow traveller P.S I find your website a little cumbersome, sorry

Your point about ...
By: timbosforporn. on 22 Mar 10, 23:05:04
Your point about power being addictive is pretty good. Its the reason why restraint in political leaders is impossible especially if they have been their for 20 years.

Most authoritarians ...
By: timbosforporn. on 22 Mar 10, 22:39:23
Most authoritarians will argue why your freedom is destructive and bad while those who love freedom will argue why it is good. Doesn't this sound like the debate between left and right in this country?

If someone does ...
By: zbigniewzapora. on 07 Mar 10, 21:11:28
If someone does something that is irrational to you that doesn't mean it is irrational to him. We cant possibly know everything about others, their circumstances or motives to judge objectively whether he is acting rationally or not. Therefore definition of rationality is strictly subjective.

> the government ...
By: CurtHowland. on 16 Feb 10, 18:15:48
> the government does have a role in upholding some liberties. What liberties does it "uphold"? Private property? No, taxation, eminent domain, various prohibitions violate property. Defense? No, people get mugged, robbed and beaten every day and police have no legal requirement what so ever to defend anyone. Liberty? No, drivers licenses, trade licenses, speech codes, curfews, arbitrary speed limits, all violate simple liberty. > {in} anarchy what are you suppose to do What do you do now?

> no problem with ...
By: CurtHowland. on 16 Feb 10, 18:07:07
> no problem with mentoring. Indeed, this is the answer to one of the standard objections to voluntary interaction, that people need to be "educated" before they can be trusted to act in their "rational" self interest. Is there a bigger single subject section of any book store than "self help"? (rhetorical question, of course)

If you really want ...
By: CurtHowland. on 16 Feb 10, 14:37:58
If you really want to know how awful, stupid and illogical those naughty "Libertarians" are, visit the one and only web site dedicated16 years to critiquing and debunking everything "Libertarian": Google "Mike Huban Critiques of Libertarianism" today! Just make sure you're not eating anything, or you will spew it all over your keyboard.

I see no problem ...
By: ExquisiteDoom. on 11 Feb 10, 11:17:36
I see no problem with mentoring. I see no problem at validating wether the philosophy is consistent or not. Emulation is a perfectly natural way to be, as long as you progress on your own once a certain level of understanding has been reached. I don't see any anarchists on here being "lead".

Dude, the guy is ...
By: DrPhallus. on 13 Jan 10, 12:51:18
Dude, the guy is awesome. It just makes sense, it's like you have a feeling that somthing is wrong all your life and it's like the veil has been lifted, all the pieces come together. He presents the information in a way that is entertaining and backs up his claims with resoning and refrences. The only thing I disagree with is his view on Determinism. Everything else... spot on.

Well, I'm not like ...
By: Sivels. on 10 Jan 10, 10:03:26
Well, I'm not like that, I just try to learn from his videos, not a disciple or anything... ;P But seriously, do you find any faults in his arguments, and logic?

I notice, and it ...
By: DrPhallus. on 10 Jan 10, 06:12:55
I notice, and it makes me laugh when people look to Stefan as the Anachist messiah. "How should we do this?" "How is done" "Lead us, Stefan, Lead us." It's Ironic that he teaches freedom, and emancipation from tyranical leaders. Teaching that we can work things out on our own, and yet people ask to be led, told what to do. Told how to act and think. You reminded me of this behavour. Because you're right. The sheeple need crave a leader. I wasn't making a dig at you, my apologies.

what irony? I was ...
By: Sivels. on 09 Jan 10, 22:05:38
what irony? I was joking

Uhhg. The irony ...
By: DrPhallus. on 09 Jan 10, 16:29:49
Uhhg. The irony hurts.

Intellectual Property and Libertarianism | Stephan Kinsella
Posted by: misesmedia

Video duration: 3649 seconds
Global video hits: 4782

Presented by Stephan Kinsella at the 2009 Mises University. Recorded 30 July 2009 at the Ludwig von Mises Institute; Auburn, Alabama.

Related: ip, intellectual, property, libertarianism, stephan, kinsella, hans-hermann, hoppe, murray, rothbard, ludwig, von, mises, institute, auburn, liberty, peace, capitalism, free, market

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

@BrytaPlanka It's ...
By: undri. on 31 Aug 10, 02:21:39
@BrytaPlanka It's an interesting thought, and the same question can be asked about children? What I as a libertarian want is for adults to be free to make their choices regardless of what others feel they should or should not do. That each man's life is his own. The dealings of animals, or children for that matter are a different story and must be dealt with separately from the issues of consenting adults. Animal rights and age of reason for example are more philosophical debates, harder to pin.

@undri Well, all ...
By: BrytaPlanka. on 30 Aug 10, 18:43:01
@undri Well, all animals living in, or connected to the lakes local ecosystem for sure... When come to think about it.. What does libertarianism think about animal cruelty? If libertarianism accept animals to be "mistreated" - then libertarianism is ethically unfit to be a guiding legal and political philosophy in my opinion.

@BrytaPlanka Does ...
By: undri. on 30 Aug 10, 06:52:15
@BrytaPlanka Does the factory own the lake in it's entirety? Does the poison affect areas that are not property of the factory owner? Who is harmed by the factory's action? If nobody is harmed and it's their land what they're doing is irresponsible, but difficult to tackle without attacking their freedom to own land. If the poisoning of the lake affects nearby rivers and land that the factory owner doesn't own he is directly affecting the owners against their will and that is wrong.

Ownership and ...
By: ethnopunk. on 26 Aug 10, 21:22:26
Ownership and control over the body is one of the rights in the South African constitution, but I disagree with the inferences made that Plato was right. The Body is not a Resource as in Utility, the Body is an Instrument which may even be extended but should never be diminished except via death, Kinsella sounds like he is advocating a system based upon corpses and espousing a worse form of capitalism than the system we have now. At least I own my own mind to some extent.

@LoklarYsera ...
By: mechanicaltruck. on 25 Aug 10, 19:46:44
@LoklarYsera Without a signature or AGREEMENT, a contract has no meaning. That is the sole purpose of a contract, as a formal AGREEMENT to described conditions between the consenting parties. The POSSIBILITY of a contract, in and of itself, does not make the contract valid. Contracts are created and abided by those who consent to the contract. Buying something from someone doesn't default you to a contract. There is no logical, practical, or moral validation in a contract that is not agreed

@mechanicaltruck ...
By: LoklarYsera. on 25 Aug 10, 16:43:01
@mechanicaltruck Just to be clear 1) You don't need a signature for something to be a contract. 2) If you willingly engage in commerce with someone a contract IS possible. Like if you sit in a barber's chair, you agree to a haircut, you don't need to sign anything. 3) Contracts are created and enforced by the state. 4) Therefore it is possible to have a no-copying clause in the products you buy. If we were to take your logic I could put my name on War and Peace and sell it as though I wrote it.

@mechanicaltruck ...
By: LoklarYsera. on 25 Aug 10, 16:39:28
@mechanicaltruck Just because you say a thing doesn't make it so. Contracts are enforced by the state. We could have a system where signed contracts weren't enforceable. It is up to the courts to decide how and when a contract is agreed upon. Is a signed contract legal? What about a verbal one? Our laws have already determined that whenever there is a free exchange a contract is possible, it doesn't need to be signed. Google "meeting of the minds," it explains how and when contracts are formed

@LoklarYsera #1 a ...
By: mechanicaltruck. on 25 Aug 10, 16:02:09
@LoklarYsera #1 a contract that has not been signed is irrelevant. The act of buying a product, in and of itself, in no way binds you to a contract of not copying the product and selling the replicas. Your statements are void of logic and completely senseless. Just plain ridiculous.

@LoklarYsera That's ...
By: undri. on 09 Aug 10, 02:55:13
@LoklarYsera That's a bit insulting, especially considering I'm one of the most intelligent people on the planet right now. However that no-copying clause is exactly what I disagree with, and find insulting. Someone, somewhere, using the government to tell me what I can or can not do with my own materials is just plain wrong on so many levels. If I make an exact copy of someone else's car, why can't I sell it ? How do you justify telling me that if I sell it you can take my money away by force?

@undri Don't be ...
By: LoklarYsera. on 08 Aug 10, 11:23:51
@undri Don't be retarded. Just because you buy a Ford doesn't mean you can now make Ford cars and start selling them at your own Ford dealership. You can make cars, sure. You can make other cars, better cars. But you can't copy their car and start selling them on your lot. Why? Because part of contract for buying a car, or music, is a no-copying clause. That's what copyright is. To do otherwise would be a breach of contract.

@libertarianjury ...
By: undri. on 07 Aug 10, 21:42:05
@libertarianjury Why speculate about impossible scenarios ? Bring something realistic to the table.

@LoklarYsera Let's ...
By: undri. on 07 Aug 10, 21:39:42
@LoklarYsera Let's take the coke as an example, if you buy a coke, figure out how to make another one from your own personally owned materials for a friend. Are you then a criminal ? What about cars ? Can't afford one, make your own from cheaper materials, but get sued because someone else made that kind of car first ? It looks too much like some other car ? There's no difference between this or any other crafting you could do that copies another design. And can you really justify that ?

It's pretty funny ...
By: pilatech. on 07 Jul 10, 08:05:05
It's pretty funny to see someone use verbal wordplay to make the distinction between being your body and owning your body, and then turn it around to attack the objection that making that distinction is mere verbal wordplay by saying that saying that is mere verbal wordplay. Things exist in the world, ownership of them is a concept we make up in our minds, insofar as we assign words to represent these concepts all talk of ownership amounts to wordplay. He's generally right though, IP is BS

@djzacmaniac If ...
By: LoklarYsera. on 25 Jun 10, 21:17:21
@djzacmaniac If you buy a CD and hand it to your friend, you're sharing. If you make a copy of it, you're breaking a contract. Just because I buy a bottle of coke doesn't mean I have the rights to the entire distribution network of Coca Cola Inc. It just means I have a coke, can drink it or give it to my friend. Buying a CD it doesn't give me the right to decide how the songs get made, copied and distributed throughout the world. It just gives me the right to enjoy it as per the contract.

@libertarianjury ...
By: djzacmaniac. on 23 Jun 10, 15:25:58
@libertarianjury Nothing was stripped from you. Do you not still have your statue? Do you own my 3-D modeling machine? My camera? Do you own my thousands of photos? You cannot reasonably predict the value until you have a potential buyer, which you have not been denied in your scenerio.

@LoklarYsera If you ...
By: djzacmaniac. on 23 Jun 10, 15:22:47
@LoklarYsera If you friend gives you that same CD, that she purchased, you didn't enter into a contract with the original seller. No third party protection. I personally think that SHARING IS CARING

When you buy a CD ...
By: LoklarYsera. on 18 Apr 10, 13:19:40
When you buy a CD you are entering a contract. Part of that contract may be that you won't make copies of it. It's a contract between the creator (or someone who bought the rights from the creator) and the buyer. The state isn't involved. Now if you draw a Mickey Mouse on your companies ads, that's another thing altogether. And I guess under libertarian philosophy that's ok.

@21:00 what if you ...
By: libertarianjury. on 05 Apr 10, 07:00:59
@21:00 what if you carve a statue out of your own marble, and someone takes a 3-D set of photos of that statue, plugs it into their machine, and cranks out a thousand copies? You labored pointlessly to create a finite resource that could be reasonably predicted to have a certain value, and that value was stripped from you by 3-d modelers. What incentive is there for people to make marble statues then? ...None

What incentive is ...
By: libertarianjury. on 05 Apr 10, 07:00:46
What incentive is there for people to murder people who walk around their statues with cameras, photographing them from all angles? A: Whatever the sale price of the statue is.

If I leave skin ...
By: libertarianjury. on 05 Apr 10, 06:55:28
If I leave skin cells behind, and you grow a brainless replica of me, and make a video of brainless me sucking big black cock, and then tell everyone it's me, have you violated my property rights? I wasn't using those skin cells I left behind. Their appropriation by you is a theft of my apparent identity, right? I don't really know. I have a better claim than latecomers, maybe, but was I using those cast away pieces of DNA? No. Therefore, you "homesteaded" them. Patterns are the key here.

If I leave skin ...
By: libertarianjury. on 05 Apr 10, 06:52:01
If I leave skin cells behind, and you grow a brainless replica of me, and make a video of brainless me sucking big black cock, and then tell everyone it's me, have you violated my property rights? I wasn't using those skin cells I left behind. Their appropriation by you is a theft of my apparent identity, right? I don't really know. I have a better claim than latecomers, maybe, but was I using those cast away pieces of DNA? No. Therefore, you "homesteaded" them. Patterns are the key here.

An advanced ...
By: libertarianjury. on 05 Apr 10, 06:46:05
An advanced artificial intelligence says "We need the space you are occupying. We will upload an exact copy of you to a perfect earth simulation, and then vaporize you and your planet." Your right to exist has not been harmed, because you are still you, and still alive, even though the inessential atoms have been destroyed. Your thoughts/patterns are still there. The essence of libertarianism is contrarianism and the urge to pointlessly argue in theoretical philosophical arenas.

The flaw in your ...
By: kevindanielbrown. on 14 Mar 10, 12:49:21
The flaw in your response is that you feel wronged because someone took something from you alas that could not be claimed as you still have your story in your possession untouched thus it's logically impossible to claim anything has been stolen from you. Copying something clearly does NOT take it away from you. Regardless of how you feel it simply can't be argued anything was stolen from you. You clearly still have your story in your possession and it's unharmed and untouched.

Correct.
By: kevindanielbrown. on 14 Mar 10, 12:46:41
Correct.

So, even if he's in ...
By: snarge. on 11 Mar 10, 07:17:37
So, even if he's in jail, I would have no claim to say that he "stole" anything from me. As is argued, you can't Steal something that can't be owned. But, like everyone here, I would be very angry and I would feel wronged if someone took my story from me and released it, used it, without my permission. If it were "real" property, I would get it back or be compensated. In this case, I have Lost nothing (or so is argued), so I have zero claim to compensation. This feels clearly unjust to me.

$SA@TAC - The Great Neo-Con: Libertarianism Isn\$

SA@TAC - The Great Neo-Con: Libertarianism Isn't 'Conservative'
Posted by: southernavenger

Video duration: 410 seconds
Global video hits: 10991

Unilke libertarianism, which Ronald Reagan once called "the very heart and soul of conservatism," it has been neoconservatism that is an aberration to the conservative movement.

Related: southern, avenger, the, american, conservative, libertarian, libertarianism, neoconservative, neocons, cpac, rush, limbaugh, george, nash, fa, hayek, ludwig, von, mises, alberty, jay, nock, russell, kirk, william, buckley, freeman, national, review, frank, meyer, edwin, j., fuelner, spectator, ronald, reagan, ron, paul, mit, romney, sean, hannity, bush, cheney, podhoretz, kristol, david, frum

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

@PikSokolit thank ...
By: enemyartistkristofeR. on 28 Aug 10, 20:52:41
@PikSokolit thank you for letting me know you are out there and that we can both peacefully coexist :) i will argue that Ron Paul is not as socially conservative as you (or anyone) might believe. He in my opinion is a True Free-mArket Anarchist - get the government out of our lives and let people choose how they want to live, so long as they do not infringe on anyone else's freedoms. Whatever his truly personal beliefs may be are irrelevant because he is about true individual liberty. peace.

@ ...
By: PikSokolit. on 28 Aug 10, 19:42:22
@enemyartistkristofeR There are socially conservative libertarians out there, maybe more then you think. I am one of those. Ron Paul is one of the more well known ones. I do not personally support "gay marriage", but i think Govt should not have any authority whatsoever in marriage. Let ppl define for themselves what marriage is. My definition might be totally different then urs, but we can both still be libertarian b/c we both want Govt OUT of our lives in our private matters.

@shiftstart yea, if ...
By: enemyartistkristofeR. on 26 Aug 10, 13:49:51
@shiftstart yea, if people want to get married it should be between them - however they decide to do it, celebrate it, use a ring, a rope cut themselves and mingle their blood together, I couldn't care less who or how they get married as long as both parties are consenting. Marriage should be a bond between two people, heck in some religions multiple people, have a blast have a ball - but the government needs to stay the hell out of peoples marriage, thats for sure!

@ ...
By: shiftstart. on 26 Aug 10, 01:41:01
@enemyartistkristofeR Agreed. So just get rid of marriage license and you are home free.

@shiftstart having ...
By: enemyartistkristofeR. on 25 Aug 10, 15:20:42
@shiftstart having government not recoognize something is basically the same as outlawing it - it means that gay people cannot get married, share healthcare, or whatever it is that married people do. The fact that the government is willing to or unwilling to recognize a private matter such as marriage, relationships etc, make it wrong. The government has no business in peoples personal life, whether its their sexuality, if they get married or not, if they want to smoke pot, whatever!

@ ...
By: shiftstart. on 25 Aug 10, 03:20:56
@enemyartistkristofeR Remember, prop 8 is not to outlaw gay marriage but rather have government not recognize it. Two different things. After all how many times have we seen all over TV a typical gay marriage being video taped at an alter? Plenty! If it was illegal, you would have SWAT jump down from the roof tops crashing the gay party.

@shiftstart Yea, ...
By: enemyartistkristofeR. on 24 Aug 10, 15:24:28
@shiftstart Yea, you are right, a libertarian CAN be socially conservative - but in my experiences they are generally not. And if they are, I agree w/ you, they can be as long as they do NOT force their views or try to use government to enforce their views on others. As far as Prop 8 goes I do think trying to stop someone from marrying is anti-constitutional, anti-freedom. Oppose it if you don't like it, I even think a church has the choice to say NO if they are against it, but outlaw it, No!

@ ...
By: shiftstart. on 24 Aug 10, 04:14:22
@enemyartistkristofeR This may be outdated but your statement about Libertarians is not entirely true. A libertarian can be a social conservative just as they can be social liberal. The idea is that whether you are socially conservative or liberal so long as you do not use or authorize government to interject your views upon others. Case in point is prop 8 in CA. Both sides are trying to use government to get a point across. Get rid of government from licensing and you restore balance

Goooooo team!!!!!! ...
By: sandythebear. on 24 Aug 10, 04:02:21
Goooooo team!!!!!! I will neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeverrrrrrrrrrrrr vote for a mainstream rep. bastard again!!!!!

Neo-conservative. ...
By: milkchaser. on 22 Aug 10, 20:39:01
Neo-conservative. He says that like it's a bad thing.

Ron Paul is ...
By: Willredd94. on 20 Aug 10, 21:21:38
Ron Paul is paleoconservative. That moron Sean Hannity is a progressive, big govt neocon. George W Bush ran as a paleocon in 2000, but after 9/11 he was convinced by his neocon advisers that military intervention was good.

Ron Paul is not ...
By: Willredd94. on 20 Aug 10, 21:16:31
Ron Paul is not socially liberal, he is 100% pro-life and against gay marriage but he believes the state governments should control the status of marriage. Libertarians are generally socially liberal and would support gay marriage and abortion. Also, libertarians in many cases are pro-war. Barry Goldwater, probably the most prominent libertarian in modern American history wanted to nation build and bomb the soviets.

@omar2000089 ...
By: hansonr22. on 20 Aug 10, 01:06:46
@omar2000089 Detroit already looks like that and it sure wasn't the free market that did it.

@omar2000089 ...
By: hansonr22. on 20 Aug 10, 01:05:36
@omar2000089 Detroit already looks like that.

@sleedolfine15 - ...
By: FantomShadowz. on 12 Aug 10, 14:13:20
@sleedolfine15 -very true-thanx for the source

If Austrian ...
By: omar2000089. on 11 Aug 10, 03:25:19
If Austrian Economics Were Ever Implemented, The United States Would Look Like Detroit In Robocop. Other Than That, Libertarian Social Stances Get A Thumbs up From Here

@dksilentbob hey, ...
By: enemyartistkristofeR. on 21 Jul 10, 13:03:02
@dksilentbob hey, the interaction and addition to the conversation is great, and always much appreciated. peace. love. anarchy

@ ...
By: dksilentbob. on 21 Jul 10, 02:42:14
@enemyartistkristofeR ya I figured. I thought I'd just contribute to your statement.

@dksilentbob I ...
By: enemyartistkristofeR. on 20 Jul 10, 21:50:04
@dksilentbob I agree. I am a free market Anarchist, I too believe in a Stateless Non-Coercive Society, one based on Voluntarism - I was only make the point for your "generic libertarian" stance.

@ ...
By: dksilentbob. on 20 Jul 10, 20:40:26
@enemyartistkristofeR well, your part right. Libertarianism can range from a minarchist government like you've described, up to a stateless society (anarchy). I happen to lean towards a stateless society altogether, but I definetely prefer a minarchy to what we have now.

Epic Vid bro. keep ...
By: gooseCha. on 20 Jul 10, 05:58:35
Epic Vid bro. keep them coming

wow well done
By: badeiser. on 19 Jul 10, 02:20:21
wow well done

I read from one of ...
By: shocktreatmenthead. on 17 Jul 10, 03:22:08
I read from one of rushes books "some wars for democrasy are okay" yes rush but we're you being honest with the word "some"?,proof hes a neo-con.

God damn, thats ...
By: maxiemofo. on 16 Jul 10, 05:04:24
God damn, thats great.

Speaking of ...
By: sleedolfine15. on 13 Jul 10, 06:08:17
Speaking of conservatism & libertarianism,one of my favorite conservative intellectuals was Frank S. Meyer. Before his death in 1972,Meyers was a proponent of a brand of conservatism called Fusionism which argued that one cannot have a virtuous society without virtuous men & one cannot have virtuous men if men lack the freedom to either choose or reject virtue. For instance,if I give to charity at gunpoint then the motivation for my giving is'nt my virtue,but my fear. Sounds libertarian to me.

ZOMG LIBERTARIANISM!!!!
Posted by: MannixThePirate

Video duration: 464 seconds
Global video hits: 12292

any other questions??? MY PAYPAL! mannixthepirate@gmai l.com www.twitter.com www.myspace.com www.blogtv.com ----- liberalism liberal tax taxes progressive Obama Health Care Public Option welfare food stamps social programs socialist socialism libertarian HowTheWorldWorks charity charities

Related: liberalism, liberal, tax, taxes, progressive, obama, health, care, public, option, welfare, food, stamps, social, programs, socialist, socialism, libertarian, howtheworldworks, charity, charities

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

one winged angel/ ...
By: drums4woodstock. on 08 Sep 10, 03:52:43
one winged angel/sepiroth theme, in the backround

Resources are not ...
By: Deztitute. on 06 Sep 10, 04:57:46
Resources are not here to be distributed based on "moral" right. They are limited, and therefore, the only just division of resources is an even one. Being wealthy is theft.

LIbertarians are ...
By: slayerfan202766. on 06 Sep 10, 01:48:51
LIbertarians are fucking idiots.

@annuocao555 ...
By: shadowgeyser. on 30 Aug 10, 22:38:52
@annuocao555 You're a fucking idiot. Research "Keynesian Economics".

Taxation itself is ...
By: FuckIt11292. on 25 Aug 10, 14:31:47
Taxation itself is theft.

libertarianism also ...
By: annuocao555. on 20 Aug 10, 21:06:13
libertarianism also supports deregulation which was wat ultimately lead to the economic collapse

I'm glad you're a ...
By: truthadvocate. on 17 Aug 10, 12:36:03
I'm glad you're a libertarian. But to say that everyone benefits from the military & police is ridiculous. Where I live, police do not allow citizens to carry effective weapons with which to defend their family. The war on drugs creates incentive for violent turf wars between drug dealing gangs. Cops spend more time stealing our money for victimless crimes than protecting us. Military intervention in foreign lands has made us the target for terrorist attacks. & it's all funded with stolen money!

OMG I actually like ...
By: jsh78mang. on 17 Aug 10, 11:38:31
OMG I actually like the video, Hell I agree with it. WTF happened to Mannix?

I love ...
By: fredjustsucks. on 11 Aug 10, 18:49:48
I love libertarianism. Statists are insane.

Were those ...
By: Allmektighet. on 11 Aug 10, 01:57:00
Were those questions from a person or are those arguents you here a lot?

"Ugnn unnn ...
By: shadowgeyser. on 10 Aug 10, 19:36:23
"Ugnn unnn kapitalism failed" More arguments presented from economic illiterates. KEYNIANISM failed, which the Austrian school has debunked (and accurately predicted all of our current crises) several times.

"Herp Derp ...
By: shadowgeyser. on 10 Aug 10, 19:34:54
"Herp Derp Capitalism doesn't help daa poor unnnn" God, the most common argument from economic illiterates. Hayek himself stated there's nothing wrong with safety nets (altruistic programs like welfare, &c.) just that nets should not be coercive as it is via government control (taxation=extortion); that safety nets should be privately run.

@IyotenX When was ...
By: shadowgeyser. on 10 Aug 10, 19:16:40
@IyotenX When was there "little to no regulation" in the U.S.?

@EvolvedOutlaw What ...
By: CambridgeHeights. on 10 Aug 10, 05:15:25
@EvolvedOutlaw What the hell are you talking about you dumb shit? I never said attacking Iran would increase our security. I said if we disbanded our military, we would be extremely vulnerable to invasion. Read what is written, don't just respond to what you want me to say.

@CambridgeHeights ...
By: EvolvedOutlaw. on 10 Aug 10, 04:41:35
@CambridgeHeights right. so attacking Iran in the near future will increase our security? I see. No...wait...I don't. Those theories go against the rhetoric of any libertarian. Including Ron Paul, the champion if the libertarian philosophy. Now, if you do your resaerch, the USA's occupation in so many countries is the primary reason for attacks like 9/11. Don't be so easily mislead.

@EvolvedOutlaw If ...
By: CambridgeHeights. on 10 Aug 10, 04:25:23
@EvolvedOutlaw If we got rid of our military, every gun, plane, tank, and soldier, I guarantee every less scrupulous organization in the world with a military (Iran, North Korea, Taliban, China, etc.) would descend on this fertile land like a pack of hungry wolves. They would enslave the children, rape the women, kill the men, and convert whoever is still alive. So ya, everyone does benefit from the military.

Much respect. ...
By: BenjaminPaulWoodham. on 09 Aug 10, 06:01:01
Much respect. Mannix, Much respect.

how exactly does ...
By: EvolvedOutlaw. on 09 Aug 10, 01:02:47
how exactly does everyone benfit from the military? Did the victims of 9/11 and their families benefit from the military?..How about the families of the young men and women that died over seas in an unconstitutional was? huh?

I would steal ...
By: ClaireLytton. on 25 Jul 10, 23:55:06
I would steal Hitler's public and military support in Germany. I am a wrong-doing theif. I would steal Hitler's life. I would steal Osama Bin Laden's life. I will gladly do wrong if you do not do right. Even if your aim is merely to remain neutral. Let's be real, people don't fight these bills because they want a chance to show their genorosity without being forced to. They argue against them because they don't want to give back to the societies that 'gave them their money/power'. Free loaders.

I will have to ...
By: IyotenX. on 15 Jul 10, 01:00:51
I will have to respectfully disagree. True capitalism means no regulation; no regulation means that the working class will be abused by the upper class. Just look at living conditions in the U.S. when there was little to no regulation. Welfare and regulation helps to soften the blow on the workers.

I have a problem ...
By: Grindermetalhead. on 13 Jul 10, 22:39:31
I have a problem with capitalism per se since I see it ass an authoritarian, hierarchical social structure antithetical with genuine liberty. It's hard to explain all the details of my philosophy under 500 characters so I understand that some of the things I'm saying may sound like a lot of unfounded assertions. Dealing with all the constraints of this format can sometimes be quite frustrating.

It might make me a ...
By: Grindermetalhead. on 13 Jul 10, 22:39:22
It might make me a hypocrite but I can live with it if it means that cancer victims won't be denied treatment because they can't afford it or that senior citizens won't lose their pensions after they retire. And I see present day corporate capitalism as a natural outcome in the evolution of symbiotic relationship between the state and capitalism, but that's beside the point.

@crazypants88 I see ...
By: Grindermetalhead. on 13 Jul 10, 22:38:46
@crazypants88 I see any concession from the state that is won over by the working class as a result of class struggle, which is a form of self-defense, so it could be justified that way in my mind, but even if that's not the case, we can't always afford the luxury of staying true to our principles. Too many lives are at stake to be dogmatic about issues like universal healthcare etc.

@Grindermetalhead I ...
By: crazypants88. on 13 Jul 10, 21:57:36
@Grindermetalhead I don't think the initation of violence will solve the problemof the initation of violence. Sure the state is coercive and violent, I agree but I don't think that gives you a right to initiate violence against other people. Corporatists are merely a symptom of the problem not the root IMO.

@Grindermetalhead " ...
By: crazypants88. on 13 Jul 10, 21:31:43
@Grindermetalhead "I used the term non-labor income as a synonym for exploitation of labor. I don't want to engage in a debate over semantics." Ok fair enough. As a rule of thumb, as long as your philosophy isn't coercive I have no problem with it.

What is left-libertarianism?
Posted by: brainpolice2

Video duration: 451 seconds
Global video hits: 6129

A summary of left-libertarianism.

Related: left-libertarianism, libertarianism, anarchism, without, adjectives, mutualism, proudhon, bakunin, tucker, rothbard, left-rothbardian, agorism, direct, action, reformism, authoritarianism, conservatism, socialism, classical, liberalism, capitalism, plutocracy, neomercantalism, egalitarianism, political, spectrum, history, revision, realignment, alliance

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Interesting vid, Im ...
By: PikSokolit. on 28 Aug 10, 20:24:34
Interesting vid, Im a Libertarian and i had always associated Libertarianism with Capitalism/Individualism in all aspects of life. Collective (Left) Libertarianism seems like it could never work b/c wouldnt that FORCE ppl into a commune situation ? Coersion is the direct opposite of Libertarianism. What if someone didnt want to be part of the group ? Would he be killed LoL I can see Left-Lib working with a small, like-thinking group. But en-masse ? That would be truly impossible.

Just as long as you ...
By: DonFormica. on 21 Aug 10, 20:49:34
Just as long as you don't worship "Atlas Shrugged" I like it.

Do you know of ...
By: zezt. on 15 Aug 10, 15:29:57
Do you know of Thomas Szasz who is a Libertarian?

So you're ...
By: PanzerDivisionBOM. on 02 Aug 10, 09:21:11
So you're anti-state and, equivalently, pro-liberty, and you've an uncommon and highly laudable insight into Corporatism, which allows you to make a distinction between government-business partnerships and the genuinely private enterprise of the free market. I might dispute your historical claims about the origins of the socialist movement, but that is not important. What exactly separates left-libertarianism from my own anarcho-capitalism? Is it just the use of words or an emotive label?

give me a practical ...
By: TheEcumenator. on 24 Jul 10, 20:33:17
give me a practical example of anti-statist socialism plaese

It seems to me like ...
By: whoo689. on 21 Jul 10, 20:23:31
It seems to me like the only REAL difference between modern-day liberals and left-libertarians or mutualist types is means to achieve their goals. Doesn't seem like much real economic argument. Left-libertarianism seems to me like big government advocacy without the government. Are you syaing you're actually against the welfare state? But without a state, how would that work? What would you replace it with? Wouldn't that violate your principle of equality?

I had a sneaking ...
By: whoo689. on 21 Jul 10, 20:20:44
I had a sneaking suspicion you were more of a left-libertarian. While I think it's great that mutualists and so-called libertarian socialists wanna get their goals done through more stateless and voluntary means, that's as far as I can agree with you. I see the whole "equality" and "fairness" thing as a whiny ruse in most economic arguments. I'm not laissez-faire, but I'm not a leftie on markets, either. Oh well. We can agree to disagree, I guess.

I had a sneaking ...
By: whoo689. on 21 Jul 10, 20:20:38
I had a sneaking suspicion you were more of a left-libertarian. While I think it's great that mutualists and so-called libertarian socialists wanna get their goals done through more stateless and voluntary means, that's as far as I can agree with you. I see the whole "equality" and "fairness" thing as a whiny ruse in most economic arguments. I'm not laissez-faire, but I'm not a leftie on markets, either. Oh well. We can agree to disagree, I guess.

I had a sneaking ...
By: whoo689. on 21 Jul 10, 20:20:37
I had a sneaking suspicion you were more of a left-libertarian. While I think it's great that mutualists and so-called libertarian socialists wanna get their goals done through more stateless and voluntary means, that's as far as I can agree with you. I see the whole "equality" and "fairness" thing as a whiny ruse in most economic arguments. I'm not laissez-faire, but I'm not a leftie on markets, either. Oh well. We can agree to disagree, I guess.

@selfrealizedexile ...
By: selfrealizedexile. on 19 Jul 10, 02:43:16
@selfrealizedexile to divide the movement in the face of inumerable statists. There's just too many greater enemies out there.

I have no problem ...
By: selfrealizedexile. on 19 Jul 10, 02:41:23
I have no problem with a commune existing in an Anarchist world. I may find its views of property, democracy, and egalitarianism to be grossly incorrect (men are not born equal in terms of intelligence, work ethic, and morality) compared to Anarcho-Capitalism whose free market makes provisions for innate differences, but, again, I'm not about to go to war with them. I agree that there are too few anarchists to divide the anti-statists.

@TheGrindsprint ...
By: evilsceptic. on 04 Jul 10, 11:25:37
@TheGrindsprint first off comparing smoking weed to rape is ridiculous. secondly if you don't like people who use drugs just don't associate with them. And finally day care personel, teachers and so on are already junkies, and as far as im concerned unless it spills over into there jobs, I don't see why they can't responsibly use drugs in their own time, its there right as an independent adult. wait wait wait reducing negative effects hardly a success? plz expand on this

@evilsceptic all ...
By: TheGrindsprint. on 04 Jul 10, 09:52:47
@evilsceptic all the facts? the first fact to consider is the fact that it is a mind altering drug. I don´t trust people who use it arounde me, or worse , my children. With legalization I would have to accept day care personel, teachers and so on being junkies. No thanks. And negative effects going down because of legalization is hardly success. Legalize rape and that whole category of crime would disapear! success??

@TheGrindsprint why ...
By: evilsceptic. on 03 Jul 10, 12:56:20
@TheGrindsprint why do you oppose legalization of cannibis? all the facts are against you 1. in the 1920s the US goverment prohibited alchohol, it caused an increase in alchohol use and organised crime. 2. in portugal after they ended prohibition on drugs almost all of the negative drug statistics went down (use/overdoses) and treatment improved for addicts. 3. I am not violating anyone elses rights if I smoke weed so why should the goverment intervene. I know this is an old post but plz reply

Oh, and I have no ...
By: TheGrindsprint. on 06 Jun 10, 09:39:30
Oh, and I have no fear of "big government". It can get as big as it needs to be to serve the people, just don´t give it too much power and keep it in a short leash.... Man I don´t fit in anywhere on YT, and I don´t know what to cal myself. btw I oppose legalization of marijuana.

Hmmm when i take ...
By: TheGrindsprint. on 06 Jun 10, 09:34:42
Hmmm when i take that quiz thing on that website where you can see where you fit in a four color spectrum, I always end up at the left libertarian corner. But i am a huge fan of the capitalistic free market system. where is the error?

@x1600meterman Well ...
By: Baculus. on 11 May 10, 11:21:44
@x1600meterman Well, depending if it is the anti-state "communism." Voluntary communism is not authoritarianism and can completely function in the free market. That is the point.

how do you feel ...
By: PJfan93. on 05 May 10, 00:20:54
how do you feel about howard zinn? agree or disagree with his views?

@MissVampireDiaries ...
By: Baculus. on 02 May 10, 10:07:19
@MissVampireDiaries Sounds about right.

@x1600meterman That ...
By: ArcadianGenesis. on 25 Apr 10, 21:34:45
@x1600meterman That is an overly simplistic statement. First of all, communism itself has many different forms. And to the extent that libertarian socialism is akin to communism, it is akin to anti-state communism. Most Americans do not think of communism in this light. Most Americans associate communism with authoritarian state rule. Obviously, this shares nothing in common with libertarian socialism, which is primarily an anarchist philosophy. So, what was your point?

anti-nationalism is ...
By: x1600meterman. on 25 Apr 10, 05:03:54
anti-nationalism is the only real Liberation!!!!

@ArcadianGenesis ...
By: x1600meterman. on 25 Apr 10, 05:02:16
@ArcadianGenesis sounds like left libertarianism is communism.

i took the ...
By: MissVampireDiaries. on 20 Apr 10, 14:49:00
i took the political compass test and it said i was libertarian left but i'm liberal and a democrat...something is not right.

@shankbone01 THANK ...
By: nocturnezero. on 19 Apr 10, 15:35:08
@shankbone01 THANK you. I've asked many questions about the positions of Libertarian Socialists with the only answer I get from stupid motherfuckers calling it an oxymoron.

Britain today: ...
By: TheDustpile. on 11 Apr 10, 01:43:41
Britain today: Labour's lax morality has helped standards crash through the floor. Just look around you. But people are truly waking up, not with just a little help from the Web. Click my username or paste title into bar: THINGS CAN ONLY GET LABOUR - WHY THE 'PC' QUISLINGS WILL LOSE THE NEXT ELECTION (SPEECH)

What is a Libertarian?
Posted by: cnelson01

Video duration: 189 seconds
Global video hits: 4385

Susan Gaztanaga, President of the Baltimore Libertarian Party, speaks about what makes a Libertarian.

Related: libertarian, party, baltimore

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

@cnelson01 We need ...
By: TheMrLiberty. on 08 Sep 10, 22:52:04
@cnelson01 We need strong defense, and not be world police

@JessicaBelle81 ...
By: ocean3da. on 01 Jul 10, 11:51:59
@JessicaBelle81 Libertarianism works in a number of ways, but at the same time for some people out there it doesn't work. It could cause more problems. No nation in the world has libertarianism as the front runner belief, for some things yes, but for a lot no.

@beebop46n2 The ...
By: ocean3da. on 01 Jul 10, 11:47:14
@beebop46n2 The problem is, as people we follow beliefs. So it isn't realistic just to have anyone do good for the greater good. It really isn't that simple as that.

In many ways we are ...
By: ocean3da. on 01 Jul 10, 11:43:34
In many ways we are all libertarians. But some of it may not be realistic for everyone. I am a libertarian, but only in non-intervention using the military. I am a socialist...

Libertarian, ...
By: beebop46n2. on 07 May 10, 00:09:13
Libertarian, Republican, Democrat whatever. All these meaningless labels. Just get rid of all of them and vote for the PERSON not the party. Give the power to the people and provide voting transparency! We need an entire congressional overhaul and start over. What we have now is a joke. What everyone needs to remember is we the taxpayers pay their salaries, and yet we are essentially robbed through corporate and bank bailouts. What a disgrace. They get bonuses and we get poverty!

The number one ...
By: beebop46n2. on 06 May 10, 23:46:58
The number one issue in this country is the power the Federal Reserve has. This country needs to take back control from the banking oligopoly elite! We'll know in a week or not whether or Ron Paul's venture to audit the Federal Reserve was successful. How can anyone oppose this? It's obvious who they are working for, and it's not the American people.

Libertarian here. ...
By: seanThree16. on 22 Mar 10, 08:34:31
Libertarian here. Well put OP. Only very few things should be run by our government.

As for being ...
By: gustjorodedheo. on 08 Mar 10, 21:48:09
As for being conservative [and following the constitution] it allows congress to collect taxes. So, follow everything but that? Seems a bit inconsistant.

So being a party of ...
By: anarchiberty. on 11 Jan 10, 23:36:48
So being a party of principles And being for NAP, the LP would not tax people? Start the presses! We got a new president ! (that does it for free, and whithout budget)

Besides ...
By: Ramshobraja. on 04 Nov 09, 06:34:59
Besides libertarians, no one else calls for restraint. Not even republicans.

Property taxes fund ...
By: sheema56. on 07 Sep 09, 19:13:55
Property taxes fund schools - this is NOT a federal issue. Same with roads (gas tax). Welfare should not exist except for the severely disabled and even then perhaps their family should provide for them instead. If they weren't taxed to death they could.....It's called PERSONAL responsibility a concept long lost in our recent history.

"Over one's mind ...
By: Pippitypopify. on 20 Aug 09, 19:14:39
"Over one's mind and over one's body the individual is sovereign" John Stuart Mill. In other words Im gonna take drugs if I fuckin well want to!

Yes it is ...
By: badmuffy. on 09 Jul 09, 21:00:14
Yes it is engineered by our corporate masters who keep raising prices and not wages.

scarcity is ...
By: mrwormburn. on 09 Jul 09, 19:51:13
scarcity is engineered

This has to be one ...
By: robison100. on 07 Jul 09, 22:22:11
This has to be one of the most ridiculous statements I've ever see on Youtube. On the contrary to what you have typed, eliminating taxes stimulates the wealth-generating mechanism that is our economy. Creating more wealth means more and cheaper ways to eat. By your reasoning, North Korea and the Soviet Union should have had the most well-fed populations ever! Yet, they are the ones that experienced and are experiencing starvation - not the USA.

ah!... so there IS ...
By: Chrisnoscrub047. on 16 May 09, 20:44:45
ah!... so there IS enough food to go around.

Because there would ...
By: badmuffy. on 16 May 09, 19:56:02
Because there would be enough if a tiny group of elites weren't hording it all.

If there isn't ...
By: Chrisnoscrub047. on 16 May 09, 18:49:58
If there isn't enough food to go around then why does it matter if we have taxes or not?

Guess what? You're ...
By: schlaflosig. on 15 May 09, 16:24:28
Guess what? You're killing a lot of innocent people in Africa right now, because you haven't sent all of your salary bucks to Africa.

Libertarians think ...
By: badmuffy. on 30 Apr 09, 20:32:15
Libertarians think we can live by the same rules as we had back when land was free and there was more than enough wildlife to support the whole population. Things are different now. There is not enough food to go around, which means if you elliminate taxes you will be killing alot of innocent people.

I wish there was a ...
By: Scoforever. on 17 Apr 09, 17:48:14
I wish there was a libertarian party in the UK.

Legalize all drugs.
By: Scoforever. on 17 Apr 09, 17:47:33
Legalize all drugs.

I'm a democrat and ...
By: souldragon24. on 31 Mar 09, 05:53:15
I'm a democrat and i can see how the libertarian party can be a little better than my party. I'm not saying im converting to libertarian party but if by voting between a libertarian and a democrat.. i might vote libertarian. i guess im what some call a libertarian democrat.

legalize meth and ...
By: SPCkeith. on 21 Mar 09, 12:55:15
legalize meth and cocaine!!!!!!

Her treatment of ...
By: fjfjvmvm. on 15 Mar 09, 16:35:47
Her treatment of constitutional amendments is interesting. She only concedes that constitutional amendments should "possibly" be considered as legitimate additions to it. How dumb can you be lady? The constitution itself provides that it may be amended. In other words we are not entirely bound to follow the orders of those who have been dead for over 2 centuries. Her paradise is to have our society ruled almost entirely unchallengeable rules dictated by self appointed rulers.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40