Bladder-Control Videos
Libertarianism video compilations
![]() |
check it out ... Posted by: mr1001nights
Video duration: 321 seconds Global video hits: 62177 check it out Related: capitalism, libertarianism, anarchism Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
![]() |
Are you a libertarian? Posted by: shanedk
Video duration: 289 seconds Global video hits: 22821 The World's Smallest Political Quiz: www.theadvocates.org Randomized version of the quiz: www.shanekillian.org CNN reporter exposed: www.youtube.com Related: libertarian, quiz, nolan, chart, tea, party, parties Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Mark Sanford Fires Back At Lindsey Graham In Defense Of Libertarians Posted by: c4lsc
Video duration: 70 seconds Global video hits: 29958 Amanda Moore asks Governor Mark Sanford about Libertarians. Related: mark, sanford, lindsey, graham, libertarians, ron, paul Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
True News 31: Naughty Libertarianism! Posted by: stefbot
Video duration: 1508 seconds Global video hits: 6963 Rebutting an an article with a typical hate-on for Libertarianism. www.freedomainradio. com http Related: libertarian, media, debating, article, freedomain, constitution Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Intellectual Property and Libertarianism | Stephan Kinsella Posted by: misesmedia
Video duration: 3649 seconds Global video hits: 4782 Presented by Stephan Kinsella at the 2009 Mises University. Recorded 30 July 2009 at the Ludwig von Mises Institute; Auburn, Alabama. Related: ip, intellectual, property, libertarianism, stephan, kinsella, hans-hermann, hoppe, murray, rothbard, ludwig, von, mises, institute, auburn, liberty, peace, capitalism, free, market Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
SA@TAC - The Great Neo-Con: Libertarianism Isn't 'Conservative' Posted by: southernavenger
Video duration: 410 seconds Global video hits: 10991 Unilke libertarianism, which Ronald Reagan once called "the very heart and soul of conservatism," it has been neoconservatism that is an aberration to the conservative movement. Related: southern, avenger, the, american, conservative, libertarian, libertarianism, neoconservative, neocons, cpac, rush, limbaugh, george, nash, fa, hayek, ludwig, von, mises, alberty, jay, nock, russell, kirk, william, buckley, freeman, national, review, frank, meyer, edwin, j., fuelner, spectator, ronald, reagan, ron, paul, mit, romney, sean, hannity, bush, cheney, podhoretz, kristol, david, frum Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
ZOMG LIBERTARIANISM!!!! Posted by: MannixThePirate
Video duration: 464 seconds Global video hits: 12292 any other questions??? MY PAYPAL! mannixthepirate@gmai l.com www.twitter.com www.myspace.com www.blogtv.com ----- liberalism liberal tax taxes progressive Obama Health Care Public Option welfare food stamps social programs socialist socialism libertarian HowTheWorldWorks charity charities Related: liberalism, liberal, tax, taxes, progressive, obama, health, care, public, option, welfare, food, stamps, social, programs, socialist, socialism, libertarian, howtheworldworks, charity, charities Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
What is left-libertarianism? Posted by: brainpolice2
Video duration: 451 seconds Global video hits: 6129 A summary of left-libertarianism. Related: left-libertarianism, libertarianism, anarchism, without, adjectives, mutualism, proudhon, bakunin, tucker, rothbard, left-rothbardian, agorism, direct, action, reformism, authoritarianism, conservatism, socialism, classical, liberalism, capitalism, plutocracy, neomercantalism, egalitarianism, political, spectrum, history, revision, realignment, alliance Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
What is a Libertarian? Posted by: cnelson01
Video duration: 189 seconds Global video hits: 4385 Susan Gaztanaga, President of the Baltimore Libertarian Party, speaks about what makes a Libertarian. Related: libertarian, party, baltimore Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 |
Bladder-Control videos :: Social Bookmarking
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css









Latest comments made on this video:
By: 2DRonaldo. on 08 Sep 10, 16:00:41
Wow allot of Right-Wing Liber-Fascists downvoting this video.
By: MrBlakskwrl. on 08 Sep 10, 02:17:22
@MrBlakskwrl notreasonDOTcom/2009/06/08/murray-rothbard-on-chomsky-left-anarchists/ Entire article
By: MrBlakskwrl. on 08 Sep 10, 02:15:35
@MrBlakskwrl ; the problem is that, in so expressing his horror at the possible results of complete freedom, Professor Chomsky reveals that he is not really an ?anarchist? at all, indeed that he prefers statism to an anarcho-capitalist world. That of course is his prerogative, and scarcely unusual, but what is illegitimate is for this distinguished linguist to call himself an ?anarchist?. - Rothbard
By: MrBlakskwrl. on 08 Sep 10, 02:14:41
@MrBlakskwrl Secondly, Chomsky has written that the anarcho-capitalist society would constitute ?the greatest tyranny the world has ever known?. (What, Noam? Greater than Hitler? than Ghengis Khan?) Whether or not anarcho-capitalism would be tyrannical is here irrelevant;
By: MrBlakskwrl. on 08 Sep 10, 02:13:51
Take for example one of our most distinguished socialist-anarchists, Professor Noam Chomsky. Professor Chomsky has recently expressed a great deal of worry about the recent rise of our ?right-wing? libertarian movement; apparently he is ? I am afraid unrealistically ? concerned that we might succeed in abolishing the State before the State has succeeded in abolishing private property!
By: bolognamof. on 08 Sep 10, 01:05:34
The problem with Chomsky is I believe that he is devoid of basic principle. If he believes in liberty then he should not just pick which parts he likes. Wage slavery is a ridiculous notion and Chomsky only uses it to evoke anger and emotion. Freedom of contract anyone? Chomsky has absolutely no understanding of economics and this is why he should never talk about the market! He should stay good at what he is doing which is his foreign policy insights and viewpoints, but that's about it!
By: FedorEight. on 07 Sep 10, 21:17:41
Give him any political/social/economic concept that doesn't go hand-in-hand with Marxist dogma - and he tries desperately to refute it: using fallacies, half-truths, outright lies, spin-doctoring en masse, all wrapped up in his finely articulated semantic horseshit which serves to impress those who place low value on their own intellect. It's his JOB to refute anything non-Marxist. Once you understand this simple and obvious fact, you understand this charlatan 90% better...
By: franks2732. on 02 Sep 10, 07:42:56
@phrimburger That is because you are not a Libertarian. You are an "American Right Libertarian" which is a "Anarcho Capitalist"The political leaders of that group usurped the world simply as a means to sucker people. Because "Anarcho Capitalist" just will not win many fans. Sadly people blindly follow their mantra without one independent thought. What Americans call libertarians is not libertarians but when I debate you guys I call you that as it is how you wished to be addressed
By: franks2732. on 02 Sep 10, 07:37:05
@pulsatingremedy The sad fact is that "Right Libertarians i.e. American Libertarians have twisted wherever possible the meaning of words to suit their narrow construct. They simply ignore everything. When debating the idiots. You have to have two dictionaries. The one every sane person regardless of belief uses, then Theirs.
By: pulsatingremedy. on 31 Aug 10, 21:23:00
@phrimburger To give you an example of a libertarian group. The French Libertarian Youth were the first documented to use the circle A, the circle represents an 'O'. The A O refer to the Proudhon quote: "liberty (Anarchy) is the mother of Order."
By: pulsatingremedy. on 31 Aug 10, 21:16:32
@phrimburger Well I think he described the word libertarian perfectly. Someone who tries to reduce the authority on the individual. But you are probably an American fake libertarian. (sorry in advance if I'm wrong) What Chomsky is referring to, is the real world libertarian. Socialists who disagree with the authoritarian forms of socialism. Or with better words: anti-Lenin socialists. Libertarianism includes ideologies such as mutualism (free market socialism) and left communism.
By: phrimburger. on 31 Aug 10, 21:05:04
@pulsatingremedy I am a libertarian and I don't feel he described me.
By: pulsatingremedy. on 31 Aug 10, 12:12:40
@phrimburger I doubt it.
By: pulsatingremedy. on 31 Aug 10, 11:06:24
@SUpersaiyajinjerkbag It's comparable with the Israel-Palestine issue. An anarchist would say, a no-state solution is best. However, we both know that that is not achievable and that it would fail miserably. So when faced with a difficult issue, we should take easy steps towards the best solution. It is useless to advocate things that are unachievable. So when asked what we should with the corporations. Pure socialism is unachievable at this time. So for now, regulate them!
By: SUpersaiyajinjerkbag. on 31 Aug 10, 01:38:24
@pulsatingremedy Not really. Chomsky is basically advocating the regulation of corporations. Reasonable but not really "anarchist".
By: pulsatingremedy. on 30 Aug 10, 22:37:03
@sh4p3shifter Too much information for you? Go back to your fox news, tool.
By: pulsatingremedy. on 30 Aug 10, 22:36:40
@SUpersaiyajinjerkbag Liberalism is a capitalist ideology. Libertarian socialism refers to systems like anarchism.
By: SUpersaiyajinjerkbag. on 30 Aug 10, 19:28:22
Meh, I see chomsky's point of view, but come on, "libertarian socialist" is just a fancy, impractical word for liberal, really (minus the feminism lol)
By: sh4p3shifter. on 30 Aug 10, 16:17:46
chomsky is a cunt imo.
By: shadowgeyser. on 30 Aug 10, 02:04:59
...Also, (according to wikipedia, lol) anarcho-Socialists & ilk (rightfully) rail against Corporatism, but Corporatism only exists because of the State and Government intervention, and anarcho-Capitalists dislike Corporatism as well. "[t]o demonise state authoritarianism while ignoring identical albeit contract-consecrated subservient arrangements in the large-scale corporations which control the world economy is fetishism at its worst."[72]
By: shadowgeyser. on 30 Aug 10, 02:02:59
There's some things here I'm not clear on...1) in anarcho-Socialism/Collectivism/Communism, do people voluntarily or *in*voluntarily pay for services thru taxation (i.e. Hayek on "Collectivism is slavery", 2) he mentions businesses as being "unaccountable" if they make a mistake, but basic economics seems to say otherwise; that businesses have to consider people for their profit. Anyone want to clear this up? Not trying to start shit, just understand.
By: suddenlyitsobvious. on 29 Aug 10, 20:54:17
Really, you say: "as an engineer & lawyer truth is exact in the former & approximate to the latter." Does this mean that when you work on a legal case facts are only approximately true? That formulations only approximately convey what is meant? I'd say law is pretty PRECISE and legal formulations are all about precision. Would you say in a criminal case a defendent was "approximately" guilty? It is simply a fact of life, that when opinions A and B differ, typically one or both are wrong.
By: suddenlyitsobvious. on 29 Aug 10, 20:46:37
I'm sorry but hardly any of your phrases doesn't contain an inaccuracy. I didn't claim to have the truth, as you say. You say: "to me as an engineer & lawyer truth is exact in the former & approximate to the latter." Doesn't mean anything except to convey your credentials, credentials a returning theme in your prose. Truth is an abstraction? I don't know what to do with all this. Let's keep it clear an simple: you say our views are equally valid. My question: WHY are they equally valid?
By: jereuter01. on 29 Aug 10, 20:27:44
@suddenlyitsobvious I would never claim to understand everything I have read by Chomsky or anyone else for that matter. There are more than two possible views that are contridictory and can occur on different levels. Some claim as you to "have" the truth, but to me as an engineer & lawyer truth is exact in the former & approximate to the latter. It is the search for meaning that leads to a truth, and once you arrive another search awaits. Truth, Beauty, Justice, Love all are abstractions.
By: suddenlyitsobvious. on 29 Aug 10, 18:37:43
@jereuter01 If two contradictory views are equally valid in your eyes it means truth has no meaning to you. You are allowed to have your opinion, obviously. You can read 16 Chomsky books but that doesn't indicate that you understood them. Indeed, let's move on.